Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Modal Epistemology and the Formal Identity of Intellect and Object

Series
The View from Above: Structure, Emergence, and Causation
Video Embed
A defence of the Formal Identity Thesis and of the immateriality of the human intellect, based on specifically epistemological arguments about our knowledge of necessary or essential truths, including especially essential truths about value.
In De Anima Book III, Aristotle subscribed to a theory of “formal identity” between the human mind and the extra-mental objects of our understanding. This has been one of the most controversial features of Aristotelian metaphysics of the mind. I offer here a defense of the Formal Identity Thesis and of the immateriality of the human intellect, based on specifically epistemological arguments about our knowledge of necessary or essential truths, including especially essential truths about value.

More in this series

View Series
Journey of a Molecular Detective; David Sherratt

Hylomorphism, natural science, mind and God

Howard Robinson argues that the early moderns were right to think that Aristotelian or scholastic hylomorphism was inconsistent with modern science.
Previous

Episode Information

Series
The View from Above: Structure, Emergence, and Causation
People
Robert Koons
Keywords
Modal Epistemology
hylomorphism
metaphysics
aristotle
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 27/02/2018
Duration: 01:29:57

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Video Video RSS Feed

Download

Download Video

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford